THE NEW LAW OF THE LAND OR IS IT?
by Pen Tale
“RUSH: My friend, Andy McCarthy, has a piece on this at PJMedia.com. His headline is: “Obamacare Ruling: Pure Fraud and No Due Process.” Here’s how he opens: “Led by Chief Justice John Roberts, the Supreme Court decided that Americans have no right to due process. Indeed, the court not only upheld a fraud perpetrated on the public — it became a willing participant.” That’s exactly right! This whole law has been presented fraudulently. The whole thing was a fraud. Obamacare passed in Congress through trickery” Rush Limbaugh’s website June 29, 2012
Rush has gone ballistic and at the same time wants to cry. What Rush is really saying is that he weeps for America, “So we, who cannot be protected from the political choices we make.” Just as Jesus wept for Jerusalem (Luke 23:28), Jesus could not protect the people from the choices that they made . The mighty, all knowing, etc., Rush (I write this in great respect for Rush) has met his “waterloo.” He and his friend, Andy McCarthy, along with many others are crying, no shouting FRAUD! and lack of “DUE PROCESS!”
They know the answer, most don’t have a clue, but they do, they just haven’t put the pieces together. To put the pieces together we must go back to the Supreme Court’s first ruling on where they said that they could not (would not for it was their position to do so) rule on on the lack of “DUE PROCESS” used by Congress in the so-called adoption of the 14th Amendment. It failed the constitutional test of the “DUE PROCESS CLAUSE.” No one thought it important, so it has laid dormant, except to be brought to light occasionally by “voices crying in the wilderness,” who have no audience, were believed to be “crazy of sorts.”
The 14th Amendment lies at the “root” of our problem of today and nothing can be done or will be done until we, the people elect representatives to Congress, who will declare by legislation that the 14th Amendment was never lawfully (lawful always means constitutional because no statute is lawful that cannot be traced back to its constitutional root) passed.
Then, that same group go to work to bring all “non-whites” under the Constitution without being “slaves” of Congress. Much has been written about the unlawful adoption of the so-called 14th Amendment, so I will not repeat it here (apenstale.wordpress.com for info.) . With the passage of the Social Security Act where states issued to its Citizens, whites’ protected by the “Bill of Rights,” social security numbers and brought them under the umbrella of a state run retirement program, Congress then played its “bait and switch” game,
“and Then in 1939 the U.S. government repealed the Social Security Act ( a little known fact), and reenacted it into the 1939 Income Tax Code, with a new intent and meaning classifying everyone who has a SSN a ‘taxpayer’ and a federal citizen of the United States under the so-called 14th Amendment. ……..” from “The Patriot Publication”
The point here is that the only legitimate “Citizens” of the Constitution had Social Security Cards issued under false pretense and were by “Federal Statute” made “citizens” of the Federal Government. Two distinct classes of citizens: Whites, with the Protection of the “Bill of Rights” and “non-whites,” with “Privileges and Immunities” given by Congress were now classified as 14th Amendment “citizens,” with “Privileges and Immunities” only.
I could go on and on, but Justice Roberts in his ruling said a lot: Federal “citizens” (US citizens) must do what they are told to do by their elected officials and I cannot and I will not help you. Of Course, he could but not until the original ruling of the Supreme Court has been overturned.
All of this still remains a legal matter on the one hand and a political matter on the other hand. Rush has the ear, he has to get his thoughts straight on the matter. I know of no one, with the exception of Glenn Beck, capable of getting the ball rolling.
“During the first week of July we celebrate July 4th, which has come to be called “Independence Day.” There was a time when that had meaning, but no more. Now it is a pathetic joke. Most Americans take a day off from work, light a few fireworks, roast a few hot dogs and boast about their :”freedom.” Another sick joke! We are “free” to do what the federal government tells us we must do and we are “free” to avoid those things they tell us we must not do and that is the sum total of the “freedom” we have left. The pathetic thing is that most people can not discern that fact.” Revised history by Al Benson, Jr revisedhistory.wordpress.com
The Supreme Court just handed down a ringing endorsement of Obamacare, which says, basically, that the federal government can compel you to buy health insurance whether you want it or not and then can tax you (penalize you) if you don’t buy it. Obama wanted this; Congress voted to give it to him so we “could find out what’s in the bill” and the Supreme Court upheld all this legal chicanery and we are still dumb enough to call ourselves free?
“So we, who cannot be protected from the political choices we make, spend all this time debating and arguing against a piece of legislation based on the Commerce Clause. The court admits they can’t find it constitutional, so guess what? We’re gonna make this thing legal by calling it a tax increase. Government can do that. There’s a reason nobody predicted this outcome. And the reason is nobody was thinking outside the boundaries of the law.” Limbaugh’s website June 29, 2012
“But the first day is where the fraud happened. The first day the government says it isn’t a tax. The second day, the government, as a backup, said, “If you don’t like the Commerce Clause, we also think it’s a tax.” The government was allowed to argue this both ways. The first way they were allowed to argue that it wasn’t a tax so that the case would go on. The next day they were allowed to argue as a back stop, if the commerce part of it fell apart, that it was a tax. But a lot of these observers who were bored on the first and second days of oral arguments were then shocked yesterday when the chief justice rejected the Commerce Clause argument and ended up “agreeing with Verrilli that the mandate simultaneously was and was not a tax, and that therefore Obamacare would stand. Roberts joined the court’s four liberal justices, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor and Kagan, who seemed prepared to uphold Obamacare under any circumstances.”
“Unbelievable! NRCC Fundraises Off of Decision, Agrees It Wasn’t the Court’s Role to Defend the US Constitution
It’s not the job of the court to protect the people from the consequences of their political choices? Really? So anything a Congress passes in any way that they pass it, the court’s gonna uphold? No matter what it is? Because it’s not their job to determine whether or not it’s American? Which is, to me, what constitutional is. Everybody is just laissez-faire here, it’s hands off. Oh, and by the way, if the way our elected officials wrote it doesn’t work, guess what? You people, whose political choices I’m talking about, guess what, I’m going to write something that none of you ever anticipated, that nobody ever made as a choice, and I’m gonna make it the law of the land. What defense do we have?” From Rush Limbaugh’s Website June 29, 2012
“Marbury v. Madison is Out and Roberts v. America is In
RUSH: Look, if the chief justice of the Supreme Court is gonna say that it’s his job to find every way possible to make sure that the act remains constitutional as opposed to throwing it out, then you got to do that. You’ve got to find the act constitutional. You’ve got to do whatever you can to make sure the act is sustained or survives. Well, let me translate that for you. What that means is it is now the self-appointed role of the Supreme Court to find ways to uphold unconstitutional laws and regulations.
In which case, we don’t need a Supreme Court. The Congress can now just pass anything, if this is gonna be consistent from the court. If whatever they pass, the court’s gonna bend every which way possible to find it constitutional — including rewriting it, which is what happened. You talk about activism? By Justice Roberts stretching as far as he can to make sure he’s not called an activist, he ends up being the most activist judge on the Supreme Court I can recall since Brennan or Douglas!” Rush Limbaugh’s Website
“I Am Literally Sick Over This Obamacare Travesty BEGIN TRANSCRIPT RUSH: OkayB, folks. I now know what happened yesterday. I’ve had time to dig into this. Time that I did not have prior to yesterday’s program and did not have during the program. And I can’t tell you how sick I am. I am literally sick over what happened yesterday. I don’t know how else to describe it. Literally sick. …A giant total fraud was perpetrated on this country yesterday. The Supreme Court as an institution is forever tarnished. There are now no limits anywhere on the size, scope, the growth of government. We were the victims of a purposeful, intentional fraud yesterday. There is no way, were anybody in Washington concerned about the Constitution, there is no way Obamacare gets anywhere close to being law in this country. There is no way it even approaches constitutionality. And the chief justice of the US Supreme Court knew that. He felt it was his duty, however, to save the legislation.” Rush Limbaugh website June 29, 2012. Rush also stated: No one was thinking outside the law and that’s why no one anticipated the decision. (paraphrased).