“Law of the Land Breached!” by Bill Ivy

“Law of the Land Breached!”

The When, Where, and How “We the People” lost our true intended American Heritage,
what’s left out of Public (Government) Education.

Text titles in their order:

1. True and Falsified Definitions (1 page)

2. The Lost Confederacy (1 page)

3. 14th Amendment: Government, Citizenship Status, and the American Heritage

(Point of Origin of our Fall) (2 pages)

4. Arizona Throws Towel in the Ring; Surrenders to Court’s ruling.

(Fall of States Rights / Self-Government under the 10th

Amendment) (3 pages)

5. U.S. Government citizen (creation of Federal citizens) (1 page)

6. Tea Party Revolution (2 pages)

7. Grandpa, Tell Me A Story (2 pages)

8. One Body / Common Answer (2 pages)

9. American Socialization and the 14th Amendment (2 pages)

Article V Group
e-mail: dueprocessrequired@gmail.com
or (843) 875-3597 (Joel Rorie, Art. V speaker)

“The ONLY PATH that exists to TAKE BACK AMERICA.”

Nullify the 14th Amendment!

True and Falsified Definitions
By: Bill Ivy

Definitions are relative to our understanding. Has there since been a deception laid for our understanding of
America’s established system of government through the POWER of falsified definitions? That answer follows.
Articles of Confederation, the Union’s first Constitution.
Article I: The style of this Confederacy shall be “The United States of America”
Article II: Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom and independence, and every power, jurisdiction and right
which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated to the United States in Congress assembled.
The US Constitution, the Union’s second constitution, was to retain the above. James Madison, in Federalist
Paper #39, paragraph 11, last 2 sentences, references the above.
“Each state, in ratifying the Constitution, is considered as a sovereign body, independent of all others, and
only to be bound by its own voluntary act (the right to secede). In this relation, then, the new constitution will, if
established, be a federal and not a national constitution.”
Using the understood definitions for the words federal and national of our founders, Madison describes the
meaning to each in Federalist Paper #39, paragraph 7, second sentence. He states:
“Federal: regards the Union as a Confederacy of sovereign states.
National: regards the Union as a Consolidation of the states.”
It is clear to see that the Founders and Framers of the US Constitution understood that the federal system
meant a Confederacy and that each state held to its sovereignty. And that the national system meant the
consolidation of the states to form a one nation government where states no longer held to their sovereignties.
When it was seen that the Southern states were losing the war, Webster’s Dictionary, in 1864, made a change in
political word meanings for what was on America’s horizon. In 1865, the US government made Webster’s the official
dictionary for the US Government. Here is Webster’s altered definition of the word “federal”, in my on-hand 1978
edition, to compare with Madison’s description above.
“Federal: formed by a compact between political units that surrender individual sovereignty to a central
authority, but retain certain limited powers.”
Is this not the definition that Madison was relating to national?! The creators subordinate to the creation. Our
true federal system was a confederacy of sovereign states. Consolidation of the states, with Washington D.C. being the
supreme power was not what came through the doors of the 1787 Constitutional Convention.

http://proliberty.com/observer/20051222.htm
Present questions to: Article V Group (843) 875-3597 or rorie8th@bellsouth.net
Both “original editions” of the 1863 and 1864 Webster’s Dictionaries are held by the Article V Group

Addendum
Robert E Lee, in a letter to Lord Acton, the year Congress proposed the 14 th Amendment, 1866. Read his words
well. Another forewarning against the 14th Amendment.
“The consolidation of the states (true intent of the 14th) into one vast republic (one nation, centralized national
government, Washington Supreme, foreign to our established form of government, as presented by Madison above),
sure to be aggressive abroad and despotic at home, will be the certain precursor of that ruin which has overwhelmed all
those that have preceded.”
And Thomas Jefferson, on Washington being the supreme power under centralized national government.
“When all governments, domestic and foreign, in little as in great things, shall be drawn to Washington, as the
center of all power, it will render powerless the checks provided of one government on another (relationship between
Federal and State governments), and will become as venial and oppressive as the government from which we
separated.”

The 14th Amendment created the American citizenship status of today, doing away with that of the founders
citizenship status. It made the federal government supreme over the states (refer back to page 3). The amendment,
though, is illegal, failing to ratify!!!
http://www.14th-amendment.com/Miscellaneous/Articles/South_Carolina_Law_Review/page_frame.htm

The Lost Confederacy
By: Bill Ivy

When most Americans read or hear the words confederate or confederacy, such words are not related to the
system of government that was originally established by America’s Founding Fathers. That’s because public
(government) education does not connect the United States of America as ever having been a Confederate system of
government, and that it has always been one nation under a national system of government, with the supreme
authority being held by the United States Government. Americans have been taught that a Confederate system of
government relates to the Southern States of the 1860’s and not that of the entire Union of States. Even Webster’s
Dictionary leads one to hold to this belief.
Confederacy: (1) A loose league of persons, parties, or states: ALLIANCE, CONFEDERATION
(2) cap: the 11 southern states that seceded from the US in 1860 and 1861.
Thus public education relates a Confederate system of government to 11 southern states of the 1860’s and not
that of the entire established Union of States. Students stand upon the knowledge they were taught through public
educations “spoon-feedings.”
“The philosophy in the schoolroom in one generation will be the philosophy of government in the next.”
Abraham Lincoln.
There is the long existing Constitutionalist Movement and now the ever growing Tea Party Movement with both
groups crying out, “Take Back America!”. Isn’t it only logical to first know what has been lost in order to take something
back? The majority that make up both these groups retain their beliefs that the United States of America has always
been one nation, under a centralized system of national government and never a confederacy as that of the 1860’s
South. Let’s learn what has been lost so that we can know exactly what we hope to take back. Could the United States
ever have been a confederate system of government as were the states of the old south and not the national system of
government that exists today?
While the English Colonies were still fighting for their independence, they formed a compact between
themselves, a constitution. This constitution was called the “Articles of Confederation”, forming a confederacy, a league
of sovereigns united.
Article I: The style of this confederacy shall be “The United States of America”.
Article II: Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom and independence, and every
power, jurisdiction and right which is not by this confederation expressly delegated to
the
United States in Congress Assembled.
Each State under this compact (Constitution) did not surrender their sovereignty to a centralized national
government. They form a confederacy, a league of sovereign republics. A comparable example would be the Indian
nations of the west, each sovereign, uniting together to fight George Custer. They did not surrender their tribes to form
one vast Indian nation.
The US Constitution that followed retained the confederacy that was established under the first constitution.
States did not surrender their sovereignty to form a centralized national government. They only provided Congress
with a few more enumerated power so that the Union of states would have better harmony between themselves.
James Madison speaks of this new US Constitution in Federalist Paper #39, eleventh paragraph, last two
sentences, “Each state, in ratifying the constitution, is considered as a sovereign body, independent of all others, and
only to be bound by its own voluntary act (the right to secede from the compact). In this relation, then, the new
constitution will, if established, be a federal and not a national constitution.” Madison’s definitions, located in
paragraph seven, second sentence of the same paper are as follows:
Federal: Regards the Union as a Confederacy of sovereign states.

National: Regards the Unions as a consolidation of the states (the surrender of
sovereignty to form one nation under a centralized national government).
Does not Madison’s definition of national sound just like today’s American government? What was the
foundation for the fall of constitutional government? It wasn’t the Federal Reserve Act; it was the 14th Amendment to
the US Constitution, the root of today’s national government. Take back America? Read the classified ad section for
Fall of Constitutional Government. A confederacy isn’t evil. It’s our American heritage now lost.

14th Amendment: Government, Citizenship Status and the American Heritage

Charleston Daily Courier, November 27, 1866
It (14th Amendment) changes the character of the government by transferring to Congress the supreme power
over the states. (The Federal Reserve took control over the people’s money, but this amendment stole the people’s
government and their very citizenship status.)

Senator Kyl, early Aug., 2010, Mike Gallagher radio show, on the 14 th Amendment.
“The federal Government has supreme power over the states, and any legislation (law) of the states are
superseded by the Federal Government, and therefore are subject to abolishment by the Feds. “(10th Amendment,
empty shell.)

“…It (14th Amendment) enlarges the judicial power of the United States so as to bring every law
passed by the state and every principle of common law relating to life, liberty, or property, within the
jurisdiction of the Federal tribunals…” New Jersey Resolution No. 1. March 24, 1868. (Read it here: http://www.14th-
amendment.com/Miscellaneous/Articles/South_Carolina_Law_Review/page_frame.htm, footnotes pages 501-
502.) New Jersey was describing a NEW POWER for the U.S. Court System, a power to bust self-government and
the 10th Amendment. Here’s another:
“It (14th Amendment) is to subordinate the state judiciaries to Federal supervision and control; …If
the state judiciaries are subordinate, all the department of State Government will be equally subordinated,
for all state laws, let them relate to whatever department of Government they may, or to what domestic
and local interest, will be equally open to criticism, interpretation and adjudication by the Federal tribunals,
whose judgment and decrees will be supreme and will override the decisions of the State Courts and leave
them utterly powerless.” From the “Diary of Orville Hickman Browning, 1865-1881,” Sec. of Interior under the
Johnson Administration. This was to be a new power and authority to the U.S. Court not previously held to it
under Article III. (Remember Arizona)
Governor Bramlette, before the state Legislature of Kentucky, 1867: “The just balance of power
between the state and federal government is sought to be destroyed and centralization of power to be
established in the Federal Government through Amendments to the Constitution, which if successful, will
destroy those rights reserved to the states and people (10th Amendment), and which are essential to the
preservation of free government.”
On August 29, 1866, the year “Congress” proposed the 14th Amendment, Sen. James Blaine gave a
promotional speech for the amendment in Skowhegan, Maine. He provided the intent of this amendment. “We
intend to make citizenship National.” This citizenship (National) was non-existent as Exparte Knowles states. It
would have to be “created and established,” in law, and the 14th Amendment was to be that law of creation and
defining.

Ex parte Knowles, 5 Cal. 300, 302 (1855)
Prior to the 14th Amendment “… there is no such thing as a citizen of the United States (U.S. citizen).”

U.S. v Anthony, 24 Fed., case 14.459 (1873)

“The Fourteenth Amendment creates (established) and defines (in law) citizenship of the United States (U.S.
citizen).”

1895-96, Harvard Law Review, Vol.1X, page 311
“A citizen of a state (founder’s citizen status) is now only a citizen of the United States residing in a state.” (True
American citizenship lost!)

Senator John McCain, early Aug. 2010, Mike Gallagher show
“With the passage of the 14th Amendment, citizens changed from being citizens of the states to citizens of the
federal government (nationals of Congress, U.S. citizens).” Whether freemen or subjects, citizenship status is
the “foundation” of all nations upon earth. “Take Back America” is only a “pipe dream” until our true citizenship status
has been reclaimed, not before then.

Louisiana; House Concurrent Resolution 208 (1967)
“Whereas the purported 14th amendment was never lawfully adopted in accordance with the requirements of
the United States Constitution…”

Georgia; No. 45 (Senate Resolution No. 39) (1957)
“A memorial to Congress… to declare that the 14th and 15th Amendments, to the Constitution of the United
States, were never validly adopted and that they are null and void and to no effect.”

New Jersey Joint Resolution No. 1, March 24, 1868
“…made vague for the purpose of facilitating encroachment upon the lives, liberties and property of the
people.” “…intended to overthrow the system of self-government…” “…it enlarges the judicial power of the United
States so as to bring every law passed by the state… within the jurdisdiction of the federal tribunals…” (A power not
previously held by the Feds. Remember Arizona, 2010.)

Utah; State v. Phillips, 540 P. 2d, 936, 941 Supreme Court of Utah, Sept. 15, 1975.
“I cannot believe that any court, in full possession of it’s faculties, could honestly hold that the Amendment (14 th)
was properly approved and adopted.”

A) http://www.14th-amendment.com/Miscellaneous/Articles/South_Carolina_Law_Review/page_frame.htm
B) http://www.civil-liberties.com/cases/14con.html
C) Questions? Joel Rorie, Article V Group, (843) 875-3597, or dueprocessrequired@gmail.com

Nullify the 14th Amendment

And reclaim the “LOST” American Heritage

Arizona Throws Towel in the Ring; Surrenders to Court’s Ruling
By: Bill Ivy

Standing upon her state’s Rights of Self-Government, in 2010, the State of Arizona, supported by her citizens,
passed a domestic law concerning the state’s invasion of illegal aliens. The Federal court challenged her law, and in July
of 2012, rendered its final decision. Parts of the law would stand, but other parts were removed.

The 10th Amendment, for state’s rights of self-government, is to be an assured and protected right against
Federal infringements, unless such a law is in violation of the Constitutional compact between the states, or powers
delegated to the Federal government.

So where does this authority of the Federal Courts gain its power to infringe upon a state’s “domestic law”,
secured by the guarantee of the 10th Amendment? Where exactly is the foundational “Point of Origin”? Read with care
the following recorded statements, and “Remember Arizona,” the recent fallen Federal target.

New Jersey Joint Resolution No. 1, March 24, 1868
“…it (the 14th Amendment) enlarges the judicial power of the United States so as to bring every law passed by
the state… within the jurisdiction of the federal tribunals…” (A power not previously held by the Feds.)
“…intended to overthrow the system of self-government…” (10th Amendment State’s rights)
“…made vague for the purpose of facilitating encroachment upon the lives, liberties and property of the
people.” (Humm, yet another thought to consider.)

*** Read this resolution on pages 501-02 (foot-notes), online at:
http://www.14th-amendment.com/Miscellaneous/Articles/South_Carolina_Law_Review/page_frame.htm

From the “Diary of Orville Hickman Browning, 1865-1881,” Sec. of Interior under the Andrew Johnson
Administration. This was to be a new power and authority to the U.S. Court not previously held to it under Article III.
(Remember Arizona)
“It (14th Amendment) is to subordinate the state judiciaries to Federal supervision and control; …If the state
judiciaries are subordinate, all the department of State Government will be equally subordinated, for all state laws,
let them relate to whatever department of Government they may, or to what domestic and local interest, will be
equally open to criticism, interpretation and adjudication by the Federal tribunals, whose judgment and decrees will
be supreme and will override the decisions of the State Courts and leave them utterly powerless.”

Charleston Daily Courier, November 27, 1866
“It (14th Amendment) changes the character of the government by transferring to Congress the supreme
power over the states.” (The “creation” takes control over its “creators.”)

Government, as “Established” at the Constitutional Convention, was “Aborted” through the 14th Amendment,
and “Replaced” by supreme Federal powers “Over”
the states and citizens. The American Heritage was now ”lost”
to a new system of government, “foreign” to the Constitutional Convention!

Governor Bramlette, before the state Legislature of Kentucky, 1867, speaking on the 14th Amendment: “The
just balance of power between the state and federal government is sought to be destroyed and centralization of
power to be established in the federal Government through Amendments to the Constitution, which if successful, will
destroy those rights reserved to the states and people (10th Amendment), and which are essential to the preservation
of free government.” (Kentucky would reject the 14th Amendment, being 9th state doing so.)

Senator Kyl, early Aug., 2010, Mike Gallagher radio show, on the 14 th Amendment.
“The Federal Government has supreme power over the states, and any legislation (laws) of the states
are superseded by the Federal Government, and therefore are subject to abolishment by the Feds.” (10th
Amendment is but an empty shell, dependent upon Federal approval)
The above statement, being among others not presented, have directed you to that “Point of Origin,” giving
power to the federal court system to challenge any state’s domestic law passed under their authority under the “once
secured 10th Amendment.” This knowledge of truth hasn’t been a part taught in America’s education system! Two
questions to confront. You read the documented statements of how the 14th Amendment would “alter” the system of
American government. Why then wasn’t this “alteration” not taught in public education? Here’s a bigger question. Was
this amendment’s ratification procedures in accord with the “established law,” of our U.S. Constitution? If not in accord,
then this amendment is “fraudulent” and must be nullified, as a breaching against the “Law of the Land,” our U.S.
Constitution. The Peoples call must then be for its “Nullification!” Were the amending procedures of this Amendment
lawful, or through “criminal” action of Congress? Those that follow “challenge the validity” of this amendment to stand
as law, and these challenges as well have been denied to your knowledge under public (government) education.

Louisiana; House Concurrent Resolution 208 (1967)
“Whereas the purported 14th Amendment was never lawfully adopted in accordance with the requirements of
the United States Constitution…”
(http://civil-liberties.com/cases/14con.html)

Georgia; No. 45(Senate Resolution No. 39) (1957)
“A memorial to Congress… to declare that the 14th and 15th Amendments, to the Constitution of the United
States, were never validly adopted and that they are null and void of no effect.”

Utah; State v. Phillips, 540 P. 2d, 936, 941 Supreme Court of Utah, Sept. 15, 1975.
“I cannot believe that any court, in full possession of its faculties, could honestly hold that the Amendment
(14th) was properly approved and adopted.”

Is the 14th Amendment, foundation of empowerment for the Federal Court System, in challenging Arizona’s
state law, which was established upon the 10th Amendment, “a valid and lawful law” set into the body of the U.S.
Constitution? Were the mandated amending procedures, of the Constitution’s Article V, this amendment’s
valid “Mother”, or did Congress “breach” this article to obtain this amendment’s ratification, thus an amendment
through Congressional fraud (criminal)?

Could it be that the Congressional Reconstruction Acts, set upon 10 States of the Union, to force their
adoptions, to the amendment each had lawfully rejected through Article V, be the invalid, unlawful “Mother” of the
14th Amendment? These legislative acts were set upon the citizen of ten states, upon charges without merit, as a
punishment, and “without” the constitutional, 5th Amendment’s guarantee of Due Process of law, before the
punishment was executed. Though these legislative acts were directly involved with “Life, Liberty and Property”, the
Judicial branch never reviewed the legislation for “conformity” with the established laws of the Federal Constitution

then, and on to our day. One of the congressional charges was that these states were without a Republican form of
Government. Article IV, section 4, of the Constitution charges Congress the authority to guarantee every state a
Republican form of Government. Even so, a State so charged of being without such still must receive “due process”,
their day in court, to stand against such charge, to show guilt or innocence, before a State can be overthrown, and
replaced by new government, through Congressional order. So the question concerning the Reconstruction Acts, and
such purpose of forced adoption to these states, was DUE PROCESS RENDERED OR DENIED, before their punishment.
The next question concerns the court on that issue. Since Life, Liberty, and Property were involved in the Reconstruction
legislation, and the question of “due process” having not been provided, of which is the duty of the third branch of
government to secure (checks and balance system), why then, and on to this day, has the Judicial branch “never
reviewed these Legislative Acts”, for their full and “complete conformity” with the law of the U.S. Constitution? Read
Federalist paper #78, 9th paragraph.

If the Reconstruction Acts provided, after the Court’s review, as having been direct violence against
Constitutional law, upon several points, then the 14th Amendment is unlawful and has “never existed” , as the Law
of the Land. Arizona could challenge the “Court’s ruling” upon its domestic state law, on the grounds that the 14th
Amendment, that empowered the Federal court to challenge its law, is an invalid Amendment, null, void, and without
force, thus the court’s ruling upon Arizona’s law is invalid as well, as the court held no power to challenge the state’s
law established under the 10th Amendment’s protective guarantee. The citizens that make-up the state of Arizona,
as well as the citizens of all the states, should consider doing their homework on the history of the 14th Amendment,
and its “Mother”, the Congressional Reconstruction Acts. Should the procedures of adoption, of this amendment’s
ratification, prove to be fraudulent, understand that “Fraud has no statues of limitations”, no matter the amount of
water having passed under the bridge (time). Need some motivation for your stand in securing States Rights/Self-
Government? Read the following:

History:
http://www.14th-amendment.com/Miscellaneous/Articles/South_Carolina_Law_Review/page_frame.htm
(Be sure to read pages 492-500, and 501-502, foot notes)

Questions:
Article V Group, (843) 875-3597, or dueprocessrequired@gmail.com
http://www.apenstale.wordpress.com (new rising site)

As for the citizens of Arizona and their “tenth Amendment state law”? Their “Victory” rests entirely upon the
validity, as law, of the 14th Amendment. Have Arizonians surrendered to the Feds, or will they Rise to FIGHT-ON?! Did
the 14th Amendment ratify through Article V, or were the Reconstruction Acts, with it’s due process denied, pages 496-
97 (above history site), this amendment’s “criminal Mother”? Arizona, and all Americans, its Homework time!

Nullify the 14th Amendment

And reclaim the “LOST” American Heritage

U.S. Government Citizen
By: Bill Ivy

“With the passage of the 14th Amendment, citizens changed from being citizens of the states to citizens of the
federal government (nationals of Congress, US citizens).” Sen. John McCain (refer to Harvard Law Review) below.
Citizenship is the foundation of all nations of earth, whether free men or subjects. Citizens of the states were
freemen and “the creators” of America’s system of government. Our Founding Fathers were citizens of their respective
states, and were not citizens of the United States, citizen of McCain’s Federal Government. The citizenship Sen. McCain
speaks of was a “creation” of government and has made citizens subjects, not freemen. Let’s take a short walk through
untaught American history.
From Ex Parte Knowles, 5 Cal. 300,302 (1855), before the never ratified 14 th Amendment, “…there is no such
thing as a citizen of the United States.” States, not the United States (government), Naturalized foreigners. “The object
then to be attained, by the exercise of the power of Naturalization, was to make citizens of the respective States.” This
case was about Naturalization by the states.
On August 29, 1866, the year “Congress” proposed the 14th Amendment, Sen. James Blaine gave a promotional
speech for the amendment in Skowhegan, Maine. He provided the intent of this amendment. “We intend to make
citizenship National.” This citizenship (National) was non-existent as Exparte Knowles states. It would have to
be “created and established”, in law, and the 14th Amendment was to be that law of creation and defining. The bigger
plan behind the “creation” of national citizenship was to establish the needed foundation for the coming new system of
government, the National system of today. This was to be the citizenship of the Federal Government that Sen. McCain
spoke of. Prior to the amendment, the United States was without a citizenship, as only states (sovereign republics) held
a citizenship. The United States was not a state, nor a sovereign, rather an agent/servant of the states with limited and
enumerated delegated powers. The 14th Amendment was “pronounced” ratified on July 9, 1868.
From US v Anthony, 24 Fed., case 14,459 (1873), “The Fourteenth Amendment creates (established) and defines
(in law) citizenship of the United States (the US citizen).”
From the 1895-96 Harvard Law Review, Vol. IX, page 311, “A citizen of a state (Founders citizenship status) is
now only a citizen of the United States residing in a state.” Which is what Sen. McCain refers to as a federal citizen.
National citizenship, citizenship of the United States, the US citizen was the foundation for a new system of
American government. A citizenship foreign to our Founders, a system of government rejected at the 1787
Constitutional Convention. The foundation of all nations of earth is citizenship. Today’s outcry is Take Back America.
That first step is to reclaim our heritage as citizens of the states, status of the Founders, the foundation that was
America. Without this first step there is no hope to ever “Take Back America”. The 14th Amendment NEVER RATIFIED!

Article V Group (843) 875-3597. Build your knowledge.

http://www.14th-amendment.com/Miscellaneous/Articles/
South_Carolina_Law_Review/page_frame.htm

For answers to questions or resource documentations, call the Article V Group at
(843) 875-3597 (Joel Rorie) and ask about teleconference meetings.

Tea Party Revolution
By: Bill Ivy

America’s Tea Party Movement seeks solutions for several issues, yet is totally unaware of the “common
connection factor” existing between each. Knowing this common connection, and its silenced history, holds the sole
solution for providing those of the Tea Party Revolution their “victory”. A few T.P. issues will be presented with their
common connector. Viva the revolution!

• Illegal Aliens
The Tea Party calls for immediate deportation of such illegals on the soil of the several states. After all, they are
here illegally. While here illegally other issues are confronted.

A) Automatic citizenship by birth, for children born to parents of an established foreign citizenship status, such
as Mexico, whether parents are here legally or illegally. This is upheld by the Federal Courts through usage of the
14th Amendment.

B) Welfare care; including medical and education, and this care being upheld and enforced through the “equal
protection clause” of the 14th Amendment. Illegal aliens, and their children born on the soil of any
respective state of the Union, have a “Guardian Angel”, the 14th amendment.

• States Rights (Powers of Self-Government)
All domestic laws passed by a state, once protected under the 10th Amendment, are now subject to be
challenged by the Federal courts, for their final approval to stand, be altered, or even abolished altogether, as a valid
state law, under the 14th Amendment. (States rights, take a hike. The 14th Amendment now rules over the protections
of the 10th Amendment.)

“… it [The 14th Amendment] enlarges the judicial power of the United States [Fed. Gov.] so as to bring every
law passed by the state and every principle of common law relating to life, liberty, or property, within the jurisdiction
of the Federal tribunals…” (Can we not remember Arizona, 2010?) “… Intended to overthrow the system of self-
government…”

New Jersey Resolution No.1, March 24th, 1868.
***Read this resolution on pages 501-02 (foot-notes), online at: http://www.14th-amendment.com/Miscellaneous/
Articles/South_Carolina_Law_Review/page_frame.htm

• Right to Life
Life of the unborn, taken through abortion, is unable to be banned through law, by any state, because the living
fetus (child with a heart beat) doesn’t qualify, “under the 14th Amendment,” as a person, having not been born. (Roe v.
Wade).
Presented were just three issues of focus by the Tea Party Revolution. Each issue’s “Existence” is directly
connected to the 14th Amendment, a single “common point of origin.” Yet this common ground between the
issues goes ignored by the Tea Party, when the “flood lights should be pulled out.” Other T.P.R. issues, such as
the Federal Reserve system, free trade agreements that send American jobs abroad, the Liberty-biting Patriot
Act, and follow-up terrorist laws serving as the foundation of an American police-state, and of course, Obama
Care, all of these laws have their “foundation to exist” established upon the same point of origin, as the other
issues presented, the 14th Amendment!! How so? Read “One Body/ Common Answer,” of the free text offer
of, “Law of the Land Breached,” received by e-mail request, from kenlittlesr@gmail.com. Victory for the Tea
Party Revolution rests upon its “curiosity”, for what it knows not of.

At least three issues held by the Tea Party movement have been shown having the “14th Amendment” as their
foundation to exist. Such is concrete fact: just do your homework. The Tea Party movement can handle these issues
as, “Politics as usual,” knowing the results thus far obtained by traveling that path, or they can ask the ”Big Question?”
Was the 14th Amendment “lawfully and properly adopted,” by all the states of the Union, or were constitutional laws
violated (breached) to achieve a “fraudulent ratification?” To not address this question could mean the difference
between a victory, or continued failure. Read the provided web-site, and text offered by emailing for it. For having
questions answered: dueprocessrequired@gmail.com, or call the Article V group at (843) 875-3597 (a chat is best). Did
the 14th Amendment ratify under Constitutional law?

Louisiana; House Concurrent Resolution 208 (1967)
“Whereas the purported 14th Amendment was never lawfully adopted in accordance with the
requirements of the United States Constitution…”
(http://www.civil-liberties.com/cases/14con.html)

Georgia; No. 45 (Senate Resolution No. 39) (1957)
“A memorial to Congress…to declare that the 14th and 15th Amendments, to the constitution of the
United States, were never validly adopted and that they are null and void and of no effect.”

Utah; State v. Phillips, 540 P. 2d, 936, 941 Supreme Court of Utah, Sept. 15, 1975.
“I cannot believe that any court, in full possession of its faculties, could honestly hold that the
Amendment (14th) was properly approved and adopted.”

Nullify the 14th Amendment

And reclaim the “LOST” American Heritage

“Grandpa, Tell Me a Story”
By: Bill Ivy

Reconstruction Acts have more to their story than is told through public (GOVERNMENT) education. Heck, even
the best known “Southern Patriot historians” haven’t presented the best of the Reconstruction Acts, upon the
Southern “States”!
First, what was the “core intent” behind these Acts? That answer is oh so clearly presented in the Congressional
Globe, 2d ses., 1644 (1867), with Senator Doolittle speaking to you.
“The people of the South have rejected the Constitutional (14th) Amendment and therefore we will march
upon them and force them to adopt it at the point of the bayonet and establish military power over them
(Reconstruction Acts) until they do adopt.” (Has a little “ring of criminal,” doesn’t it?)
So then what was Reconstruction’s purpose, anyone? You got it! The forced adoption of Congress’ 14th
Amendment. The Constitution’s amending procedures are located in Article V. Any possible Congressional breach of
this Article’s mandates of established law? Yes, but first let’s address those Southern States. Were the States of the
South ”in or out” of the Union of States during “the War”? This is a Biggie. Throughout the years of the invasion of the
Southern States, the ”United States,” as in government, stated the States of the South were in rebellion, but get this
now, “were NEVER out of the UNION.” As such, “Never out of the Union”, at the war’s end there was NOT a signing of
a “peace treaty”, as the South had been held as states in the Union, in rebellion, but never as a foreign foe, thus NO
peace treaty. A little red flag should pop up here. If never out of the Union, that tells us that these States, as members
of the Union, were under the laws of the “U.S. Constitution,” which also includes “its” protective laws over people’s
rights. And so they were. Evidence, you ask? Federal territories, whether purchased, or CONQUERED, cannot participate
in the amending procedures of the U.S. Constitution. This power is totally reserved to the States of the Union. Are you
with me on this? Congress proposed to the States of the Union, in 1865, its 13th Amendment, for their adoption or
rejection. Guess what? It was presented to the people of the Southern States, as well. Were the States of the South a
CONQUERED TERRITORY, or States of the Constitutional Compact (U.S. Constitution)? There must have been Truth in
the words of the United States, as the South, as States of Union, cast their “countable” votes.

The 13th Amendment ratified, and the Southern States made up an active part of the procedures. So then, how
was the 14th Amendment to ratify? Simple answer. Congress would decide to “GO CRIMINAL,” to gain this Amendment,
as there were 15 rejection votes (actually 17), and to kill this proposed Amendment required only 10 rejections. Can you
guess from where 10 of the 15 rejections came? Don’t guess, rather reread Senator Doolittle’s statement, and you can’t
miss. Article V authorizes the Congress to propose Amendments, with its authority ending at that point, but Congress
wanted this Amendment, and with the 10 rejections “killing it,” the path to follow was to become CRIMINALS!
A) It was the lawful right of the Southern people, under Article V, to reject the Amendment. Congress ignored their
votes. Congress ignored their rights under law. Violence to Article V!
B) Doolittle said we will force them to adopt it! Force is a little beyond proposing. Violence to Article V. Yep, that’s
twice now.
C) Doolittle said, “…establish military power over them until they do adopt it.” Such were the Reconstruction
Acts. These Acts didn’t breach Article V, though. This story is of Another Constitutional Violence, another
Congressional CRIMINAL Action!!! Reconstruction.
Reconstruction:
A) Overthrow of lawful State Governments, and placement of the citizens of those States under military martial
law (and during “peace time”).
B) President Johnson vetoes first Act due to the numerous acts of violence against Constitutional laws. (Read them
on pages 492-500 of the website noted at the end of this article, if you are a Supporter of Constitutional Law.)
C) These Acts were attacks upon the “life, liberty and property of Americans,” but the Court was not allowed by
the “Gone Mad Congress” (WE ARE CEASAR), to review the legislative Acts for Constitutional conformity. (Read
Federalist Paper #78, 8th and 9th paragraphs). To this day the Judiciary hasn’t reviewed them!!
Special note: One can kill another in front of “100 eyewitnesses,” yet cannot be hauled away to prison or “the
chair,” until the 5th Amendment’s guarantee to All Americans (yes, that includes Southern people), to DUE
PROCESS of LAW, has been served! That’s the opportunity to face the charge (murder), and the accuser (the 100
eyewitnesses), before a Judge and seated Jury, in a Court of Law. (Read pages 496-497 of the website noted at
the end of this article. It’s a “must-read.”)
D) The citizens of the Southern States were DENIED the Constitution”s “Law of Due Process.” Punishment for the
Congressional “charges” of being without law, order and a republican government, moved full speed ahead, by
Caesar’s Command. What’s the proper word for this? CRIMINAL!
So then, is the 14th Amendment a lawful Amendment to the U.S. Constitution?
Article V was suppose to be the “Mother” of ALL Amendments, but was it? I believe Congress chewed up that
Article like it was gum. That leaves the Reconstruction Acts as being “Momma.” The Reconstruction Acts were
Due Process of Law Denied!! Denial to due process is a crime. The Judicial branch has never reviewed these
legislative Acts for “conformity” with the “Law of the Land,” the U.S. Constitution, even though due process is of
the jurisdiction, of the third branch of government, the Judiciary, to see secured for “We the People.” It’s part with
the “checks and balance system,” separation of powers, to secure the people’s Liberty!! Have my words been off-
the-wall? Not if Constitutional law has been the guide.
“I cannot believe that any Court, in full possession of its faculties, could honestly hold that the Amendment
th) was properly approved and adopted.” State v. Phillips, 540 P.2d 936, 941, Supreme Court of Utah, Sept. 15,
(14
1975. (This Judge KNEW what you’re learning NOW.)
The 14th Amendment is fraudulent. Fraud has no statute of limitations, no time limit for presentment.
Furthermore, all law following this Amendment, Federal to local levels, are established in conformity with the 14th
Amendment, for “their validity” as law! Ten adoptions were by fraud, through force, violating Article V. This force
was the Congressional Reconstruction Acts, and as so stated in Johnson’s veto message of the First Act, was “Due
Process of Law Denied,” a Constitutional guarantee (pgs. 496-97, of provided website).
To “Take Back America,” restore our heritage of our Founders, only requires the Court’s review of the
Congressional Reconstruction Acts. It is NOT a Legislative issue, but a Judicial issue concerning due process. Were
the Acts in conformity with the Constitution (Fed. Paper #78, 8th/9th paragraphs)?? The Court Must review!!
Visit:
http://www.14th-amendment.com/Miscellaneous/Articles/South_Carolina_Law_Review/page_frame.htm

(Also read N.J. Resolution, pgs 501-02, Foot-Notes) Questions: Article V Group (843) 875-3597

The 14th Amendment was and remains America’s Pandora’s Box, but its Momma, the Congressional Reconstruction
Acts used to force States into its adoption, were enacted upon the “denial” of Due Process of Law, and this denial
to “guaranteed Constitutional law” is the Achille’s Heel of those Acts and its child, the 14th Amendment. This
truth is the only pathway to “Take Back America.” Don’t take it lightly. Read President Johnson’s veto message, if
you are a “True Constitutionalist.”

One Body/Common Answer
By: Bill Ivy

Constitutional activists are divided, pursuing their own agendas, thus weakened in their numbers and financial
assets. What if all the issues battled had a “connective common ground” that could “unite” the activist as one body,
with a combined resource of financial assets? Sounds like a pipe-dream, but the reality is that it isn’t! What is this
uniting common ground? The 14th Amendment and the citizenship status the amendment was to have established.
Note. “Prior” to this amendment, “…there is no such thing as a citizen of the United States (U.S. Citizen).” Ex parte
Knowles, 5 Cal., 300, 302 (1855). America’s Founding Fathers “Were Not U.S. citizens”. After 1868, “The Fourteenth
Amendment creates (establishes) and defines (in law) citizenship of the United States (the U.S. citizen)”. U.S. v
Anthony, 24 Fed., case 14, 459 (1873). For space herein you’ll have to review the resource listing at closing, to
understand clearly this message. If “Victory” is your end goal, the time spent will prove worthy! Now let’s begin.

The 14th Amendment constitutionalizes “citizenship of the United States,” a Federal/National citizen of the U.S.
Government (1868).
At creation this U.S. citizen was without the protected right of political suffrage (power to vote).
The 15th Amendment of 1870 provided U.S. citizens suffrage. U.S. citizens were able to vote in elections.
From 1870-present, all election outcomes would have the influence of the vote coming from U.S. citizens, a
citizen created by the 14th Amendment.
Those elected officials that would gain seats of office, as legislators, would write and pass laws from 1870 to
the present day; several laws activists battle against today.

Questions for the reader (think on them):
• If the 14th Amendment failed to ratify in “conformity” with the laws of the U.S. Constitution, what would this
mean for the new citizenship status the Amendment was to create?
• If “No 14th Amendment,” then there isn’t a status of “citizen of the United States, the U.S. citizen”.
• If there isn’t a status of “citizen of the United States”, how would such effect the election process and those
seated in office, with the election outcomes effected with votes that came from a non-existent citizenship
status (comparable to that of illegal aliens voting)?
• Would the laws passed by the seated legislators be held as legal or void, due to the election fraud that seated
them (non-existent U.S. citizens).
• If the 14th Amendment failed to ratify in “conformity,” with the Constitution, that created the U.S. citizen,
later gaining suffrage to participate in elections that seated legislators, would such as the Federal Reserve Act
be a legal law?

How determined are you for seeing “Victory”? Would a little “at your fingertips” homework be too much? If not, here’s
where to begin. Sure, ask others to join you.

Louisiana; House Concurrent Resolution 208 (1967)
“Whereas the purported 14th Amendment was never lawfully adopted in accordance with the requirements of
the United States Constitution…”

Georgia; No. 45 (Senate Resolution No. 39) (1957)
“A memorial to Congress…to declare that the 14th and 15th Amendments, to the constitution of the United
States, were never validly adopted and that they are null and void and of no effect.”

A) http://www.14th-amendment.com/Miscellaneous/Articles/South_Carolina_Law_Review/page_frame.htm
B) http://www.civil-liberties.com/cases/14con.html
C) Questions? Joel Rorie, Article V Group, (843)875-3597, or dueprocessrequired@gmail.com

One Body / Common Answer!
“America’s Beast” (and its loosed demons) has its “Achilles Heel”!

“Unconstitutionality dates from the date of its enactment, and not merely from the date of decision so branding it.”
(Sixteenth American Jurisprudence, 2nd Edition, Section 2.56)

Nullify the 14th Amendment

And reclaim the “LOST” American Heritage

American Socialization and the Fourteenth Amendment
By: Bill Ivy

If a court, any court, can present documented evidence, not by the presumption of facts, but the facts, that Due
Process of Law was rendered to the ten States of the South, before Congress acted upon the overthrow of their state
governments and before the implication of the Reconstruction Acts placed upon the citizens of those states, then the
14th Amendment is a valid amendment to the US Constitution. If it cannot be shown that Due Process of Law had been
rendered, this amendment exists through the violations of the Law of the Land, thus fraudulent, null and void.
“I cannot believe that any court, in full possession of its faculties, could honestly hold that the amendment (14 th)
was properly approved and adopted.” State v Phillips, 540 P.2d 936,941, Supreme Court of Utah, September 15, 1975.

Violence to Article V
I). Congress rejected the lawful votes of ten Southern States (violence), rejecting the 14 th
Amendment
II). Congress forces adoption by these ten States (violence)
III). Congress denies New Jersey and Oregon their right to rescind prior votes on the
amendment
IV). Congress forces some States to change their votes, while denying others the right to
change theirs.
Double standard.

Failure of Due Process of Law (Reconstruction)
I). Congress declares (charges) Southern States to be without lawful government, not being
republican in
form (Article IV), without law and order. Without Due Process of Law overthrows
these governments, placing the
people under Martial Law. (Punishment without a trial)
II). Military establishes new governments, with new constitutions, not allowing the majority of the citizens to
vote upon their system of government, only those loyal whites and blacks. (This was non-republican established
government)
III). Whether or not law and order was re-established, if a State adopts the 14th Amendment,
the illegal
punishment, without its Due Process of Law, comes to its end. Reconstruction was
totally about adoption of a
rejected proposed amendment, having nothing to do concerning a
republican form of government, which existed
prior to Reconstruction.

Article V of the US Constitution is not the mother of the 14th Amendment. Reconstruction, being a Bill of
Attainder without Due Process of Law, is this amendments birthmother. The 14th Amendment established the
foundation for centralization into a national system of government with Washington being the “supreme authority”
over the States and was the outcome of fraud, not law. Fraud has no statute of limitations. With the court having
jurisdiction and authority to guarantee the fulfillment of Due Process of Law, the 14th Amendment can be brought
before the Court “in question to its validity” grounded upon the failure of Due Process of Law (Reconstruction) and the
means for acquiring adoption illegally.
The socialization of America’s system of government requires the foundation of centralized national
government. That is, a centralized authority, with all other powers being subordinates to the centralized authority (US
government power over state power). Without the centralization of authority there can be no socialization. The
answer to crumble all acts of American socialization, such as the abolition of private property in land (property tax, 1 st
plank of the Communist Manifesto), the 16th Amendment (progressive direct income tax, 2nd plank of the Communist
Manifesto), the Federal Reserve (central bank system, 5th plank of the Communist Manifesto), and the new socialization
of health care is to be found in the validity of proper adoption and ratification of the 14th Amendment. Was it adopted
in accordance to the Law of the Land? Expose this truth and there will be the restored system of American government
as established at the 1787 Constitutional Convention. No other answer exists for the American people!!! How was this
amendment to have its birth? Through the failure of Due Process of Law and NOT through the mandates of law under
Article V of the US Constitution’s amending process. Allow the Senator to tell you himself how this amendment was to
be adopted, being the foundation for a government system rejected at the Constitutional Convention and the required
foundation for Americas socialization of government. “The people of the South have rejected the Constitutional
Amendment (their right by law under Article V) and therefore we will march upon them and force them to adopt it at
the point of the bayonet and establish military power over them (Reconstruction years, punishment without Due
Process) until they do adopt it.” Senator Doolittle, Congressional Globe, 2d. ses, 1644 (1867).
To crumble the socialization of America is to expose the fraud of the 14 th Amendment. It’s a single
battlefront we’re up against, not the many. Awaken to it, as it is the path to take back America.
Addendum
Where exactly is the point of origin that the people lost their America and true heritage of government/
citizenship?

The 14th Amendment!

It changed the citizenship status of Americans, a status foreign to that held by our Founders. Yeah, that’s a big
deal, a real big deal! It changed the established system of government to a system that had been rejected at the 1789
Constitutional Convention. This new system was the system needed to open the door for American Socialization. Do
order and do read Red Republicans and Lincoln’s Marxist found in the resource list on page 3. The established gate
would be the 14th Amendment. This beast does have its Achilles’ Heel. It’s found in its adoption procedures in direct
violation to the mandates of law of the US Constitution/ truly, do you desire to Take Back America? Then be willing to
do the required homework towards that goal. The knowledge is foreign to your public education teachings, you must
do the homework to learn the truth.

“The philosophy of the schoolroom is one generation will be the philosophy of government in the next”
Abraham Lincoln.

You say you don’t trust government. Education is a part of government. The classroom has taught us that we
are U.S. citizens and that our system of government is national, with Washington as the supreme power. Though truth
as it does stand today, such is foreign to our Founders citizenship and form of government. Doubting Thomas? Do the
homework.

To understand why Congress set the South under Reconstruction, visit:
http://www.14th-amendment.com/Miscellaneous/Articles/South_Carolina_Law_Review/page_frame/htm
To understand the results, e-mail wilburlittle@gmail.com for your free copy of “Thought Provoking”.
Such is a must read for those involved in the Tea Party Movement that seek to “Take Back America”.

Call the Article V Group with your questions at (843) 875-3597.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s